Can you explain why this horse trailer hitch is better? How does it couple vs the standard hitch. Id love to know the details!
That's a good question. I'm curious to hear what the old timers say.
First, to make sure we're all using the terms correctly (including myself) here's a good
primer on receiver/hitch/coupler terminology. See chapter 2.
Here's my $0.02... For 99% percent of the potholes and rough roads out there the original coupler is probably fine. I had towed hundreds of miles on it before it came off.
Besides the 7,000 lb capacity associated w/ the horse trailer coupler, I observe a thick steel housing that appears to clamp more fully around the 2" ball. (Does anyone know off hand the load rating for the original hitch?)
.
The spring loaded sleeve slides over the closed jaw and is then pinned in place. Just visually comparing the robustness I can see a simple massive increase in mechanical strength (assuming comparable materials). But then I got curious to compare some numbers... looking at the opening where the ball is captured I get:
Original Coupler:
length = 1.53" (inside front to the movable sprung latch) This part pushes the ball into the domed pocket of the coupler.
width = 2.09" It has to be wider so the ball can fit in since there is no mechanical adjustment in this dimension.
Wall thickness = 0.17"
Horse Trailer Coupler:
length = 1.69"
width = 1.65"
wall thickness = 0.4" (minimum)
So, why is the horse trailer hitch better? It appears to me it captures the ball all the way around the stem, not primarily just from front to back. With such thick walls, the horse trailer coupler is not likely to be the part that deflects or fails on my next trip across 580.
**One other note, I thought I read elsewhere on this forum someone saying the sprung latch was adjustable so you could use different sized balls. This goes against everything I understand about towing - that the ball and coupler MUST be the same size. However you do it, get there safely.
Cheers,
--Ken